When the Foreman interrupts to say no one is personally attacking anyone else in the jury room, Juror Five slams his hand on the table, saying that it is personal. The Hispanic defendant was deemed not guilty on the grounds of self-defence even though he pursued and shot the unarmed Martin.
Active Themes The Foreman then comments that he had a friend who wanted to be on the jury instead of him. Active Themes Juror Seven nervously offers gum to the men at the water cooler and makes idle chat.
Three claims an interest in the facts, but more often restricts his arguments to verbally supporting Four when he presents facts and logical reasoning. The critical role of the 8th juror Rose characterises the 8th juror as a spokesperson for justice who foregrounds the concept of reasonable doubt.
Likewise, the 3rd is forced to recognise the degree to which his personal vendetta interfered with the decision-making process. Later in the play, Two is shown to be easily persuaded and influenced by persuasive language rather than facts.
Similarly other jurors also have personal commitments and experiences that make them more likely to react to the evidence in different ways and many discount the seriousness of their legal responsibilities.
The Foreman announces that he will leave it to the others to decide how to proceed, and the men all agree to take a vote to see where they stand before deliberating. He is a quiet, thoughtful gentleman who sees all sides of every question and constantly seeks the truth. The Foreman continues that his friend served on a jury where they found the defendant not guilty, but later learned that he really did the murder.
This is significant indeed, because it sets Juror Number Eight aside from the rest in that he is the only one that uses his brain and common sense, and not his schema, to emit a vote. They want a quick verdict. The 6th juror who is a house painter has had experience of apartments that overlook an el line and can testify to the noise.
He then synthesises the content by pulling together what he had summarized, and analysed and discusses it with the input of the other jurors. The 7th juror is more concerned about the baseball match. Similarly, Rose points out how Juror Number Nine is a defeated man awaiting his death while Juror Number Ten is a passive-aggressive type man who just enjoys aggravating people.
Active Themes The Foreman then comments that he had a friend who wanted to be on the jury instead of him. Four thinks they can determine the truth, regardless. Juror Four pushes the point that the lawyers took the jurors to the el track and they were able to see what was happening on the other side.
Later in life, the two are not in touch with each other. The eye-witnesses manipulate and distort the facts to confirm their personal views. Because Three has a poor relationship with his son, he sees all young men as ungrateful and difficult. Although it is important to read about thinking and learn how other people think, there is no substitute for actually doing it ourselves.
Nine is aloof, but polite. As Act 1 reaches a climax focusing on an aggressive encounter between the two main protagonists — the 3rd and 8th jurors — the verdict is equally poised. This play was made into a movie inproduced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay.
The unlocking of the door and the knife in the table that was critical to the fact-finding process suggest that prejudice has been dispelled.
Stubbornness and Taking a Stand Prejudice vs. Seven and Three reveal their certainty about the case, and it does not appear that the evidence presented or the arguments made in court were well balanced between prosecution and defense.
The Foreman also corrals Juror Eight, who is standing at the window not paying attention, to sit down. Throughout, Four is rational and levelheaded. The Guard locks the door behind him as he leaves, with all the jurors settled in their seats.
The window is an innocent object over which the jurors clash. Active Themes Juror Four, now holding the switch knife that has been brought back into the room by the guard, challenges Juror Eight. He is a man of strength, tempered with compassion. Thus Rose would suggest they reach a fair and reasonable verdict.
The Foreman suggests in response that serving on a jury is their duty, while Juror Three jokes that Juror Four should give Juror Twelve a job, noting that Juror Four is probably rich because of his custom-tailored suit. Juror Four proposes the compromise of trading chairs.
Active Themes As the jurors enter, some go to the water cooler, Juror Five lights a pipe, and Juror Seven opens the window a bit wider, while still others stand and lean on their chairs.
Group dynamics The clashing of egos and the rising conflict among the jurors is reflected in the oppressive atmosphere of the jury room. These mundane activities establish the jurors first and foremost as human beings, capable of flaws and prejudices.
Later, Nine will further discuss the concepts of truths and lies.Character Analysis On Juror 8 For 12 Angry Men. Reginald Rose’s ’12 Angry Men’ brings 12 jurors together in a room to decide whether a young foreign boy is guilty of killing his father.
The play is interwoven with dynamic characterisation, striking symbolism and intense moments of drama. In Reginald Rose's awesome play Twelve Angry Men the character of "Juror No.
Eight" corresponds to an amiable, analytical, and intelligent man who is actually the only one who gives the accused. Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose “Facts and fancy” by Dr Jennifer Minter (English Works articles) At the beginning of Reginald Rose’s play, Twelve Angry Men (), the judge states, “it now becomes your duty to try to separate the facts from the fancy”.
12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
The play is set in a New York City Court of Law jury room in The play opens to the empty jury room, and the Judge’s voice is heard, giving a set of final instructions to the.
An Analysis of Juror #8 in the Play 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose. words. An Analysis of the Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Roses and the Capacity of Justice. words.
A Focus on Juror#8 in the Play "Twelve Angry Men" words. 1 page. A Literary Analysis of Twelve Angry Men. 2, words. Instant downloads of all LitChart PDFs (including Twelve Angry Men).
LitCharts Teacher Editions. Teach your students to analyze literature like LitCharts does.Download